Comments on: Avatar The Movie 2009 and 2010 Best Sci Fi Movie For Now

By: New Trailer For Shrek Forever After

New Trailer For Shrek Forever After — Fri, 26 Mar 2010 12:55:39 +0000

New Trailer For Shrek Forever After…

I am a new mac user and installed chicken of the VNC to connect to a linux server (which is configured for tightVNC). I can ping the server and telnet to it without a problem but when I try to connect to it using chicken VNC, I am not getting anything….

By: Ingela

Ingela — Mon, 11 Jan 2010 03:13:55 +0000

I saw AVATAR last weekend in 3D and that was an amazing experience!!! I live in a small city in Sweden and we have an amazing cinema that have 3 D. I think I was the oldest woman in the audience but so what! Loved it and will see it once more!

Ingela /Sweden

By: Anonymous

Anonymous — Sat, 02 Jan 2010 01:41:29 +0000

The Avatar Movie 2009 – Reviewed As Top Sci Fi Movie for 2010…

The Avatar movie by Cameron {is|seems to be|is quite|is turning out to be| a solid transformation in the film industry, giving us a new interpretation of the evolution of man into alien state. This post reveals why the pros and cons that may make thi…

By: Science Fiction News and Stories

Science Fiction News and Stories — Thu, 31 Dec 2009 02:52:35 +0000

[...] vaultboss Jim Cameron’s Avatar http://scifisciencefiction.com/avatar-movie-2009-2010-new-avatar-movie – 2009 Border Stone sci fi movie, 2010 as [...]

By: Simon Cad

Simon Cad — Tue, 29 Dec 2009 19:38:34 +0000

Hey Steve, fantastic post. I have yet to see Avatar but will be sure to after reading this post.

Thanks again.

Simon

By: SciFiBigFAN

SciFiBigFAN — Sat, 26 Dec 2009 04:54:36 +0000

Looks like they've already poured more than $300 million into making this first Avatar movie…so I bet there will be more to come.

As a matter of fact, not only James Cameron declared that even if he doesn't have the scripts, he has the plot already setup in his mind for two sequels at least..

But I'd say it would be stupid for the studios, after pouring so much cash into the project, NOT to use the same CGI (lots and lots of millions to make the software, the designs, etc…) for some more. The profits could be at least double (for each sequel) than the ones expected from this first attempt.

By: Brad Spencer

Brad Spencer — Thu, 24 Dec 2009 08:49:02 +0000

I wish I could get people to come with me to see this movie...

I absolutely can't wait to see it...I saw the ad months ago and it's nice to see a "non-franchise" movie get made.

I took 2 film courses in college and my 2nd class had a major research project. I did mine on how the business of movies has changed to where only franchise films get made (sequels and prequels) because the average movie costs over 100 million to make.

The logic for studios is that it's easier to put 100 million out if you have an original so that's why we get tons of Shrek, Bond, and Star Wars movie.

Lookin forward to seeing how this blog evolves...I'm a closet nerd...nice to have a place to hang out!

Cheers,

Brad